Repeal of Mold-Related Services Law Threatens Floridians

March 12, 2011

Fellow Floridians

I am sending you this message in the hope that you will help prevent the repeal of the current mold licensing law by sending a personal request to NOT repeal the current mold licensing law to both your District Representatives and Senators.

It is very important for everyone you know to do the same.  Please share the need to send emails and make calls to everyone you know that would be impacted by the repeal of this law.  Send to the media, news papers, radio and TV stations, mold assessors, mold remediators, adjustors, family and friends that will benefit from a licensed mold professional.

With all that was done to create the current legislation and set a mold industry standard for our state it would be a shame and a devastating blow to our industry to see the law repealed.
Please include your current license number and a personal request to NOT repeal the current mold licensing law.

Link to Florida Representatives
http://www.myfloridahouse.gov/SEctions/Representatives/representatives.aspx

Link to Florida Senators
http://www.flsenate.gov/Senators/

 

Recent post regarding the current proposed legislation.
The Push to Repeal the Florida Mold Licensing Law
Licensing and Regulating the Florida Mold Industry
Florida Mold Licensing Law Update

 

John P. Lapotaire, CIEC
•Certified Indoor Environmental Consultant
•Microshield Environmental Services, LLC
www.Microshield-ES.com


HB 4171 Mold Related Services Repeal

March 10, 2011

The move to repeal the current mold licensing law is working its way through committee.  Below is the list of appearances and voting results.

 

 

Bill Number: 4171
Bill Name: HB 4171
Action: Favorable
Committee: Business & Consumer Affairs Subcommittee
Location: 12 HOB
Duration: 2.00
Date: 3/8/2011 1:00:00 PM
Sponsor: Grant
Subject: Mold-Related Services
Y  Abruzzo Y  Bovo Y  Goodson Y  Patronis Y  Slosberg
Y  Ahern Y  Crisafulli N  Jones Y  Roberson, K. N  Stafford
Y  Artiles Y  Eisnaugle Y  Nuñez N  Rouson Y  Young
Total Yeas: 12 Total Nays: 3 Total Missed: 0 Total Votes: 15

 

Bill History:
Event Time Member Committee
Now in Economic Affairs Committee Wednesday, March 09, 2011 11:38 AM Economic Affairs Committee
Reported out of Business & Consumer Affairs Subcommittee Wednesday, March 09, 2011 11:38 AM Business & Consumer Affairs Subcommittee
1st Reading Tuesday, March 08, 2011 10:24 PM
Favorable by Business & Consumer Affairs Subcommittee Tuesday, March 08, 2011 3:00 PM Business & Consumer Affairs Subcommittee
Added to Business & Consumer Affairs Subcommittee agenda Friday, March 04, 2011 4:06 PM Business & Consumer Affairs Subcommittee
Now in Business & Consumer Affairs Subcommittee Thursday, March 03, 2011 9:50 AM Business & Consumer Affairs Subcommittee
Referred to Economic Affairs Committee Thursday, March 03, 2011 9:50 AM Economic Affairs Committee
Referred to Business & Consumer Affairs Subcommittee Thursday, March 03, 2011 9:50 AM Business & Consumer Affairs Subcommittee
Filed Wednesday, February 16, 2011 2:41 PM Grant

 

 


ASTM Manual on Moisture Control in Buildings NEW EDITION!

March 10, 2011

New Edition! Manual 18 Moisture Control in Buildings: The Key Factor
in Mold Prevention: 2nd Edition

Twenty-eight comprehensive chapters focus on the major issues involved in the process of moisture resistive construction. This one-of-a-kind publication provides the latest and most important information relating to moisture problems in buildings.
Three new chapters have been added to make this the ultimate publication on moisture control:

  • Details and Practice
  • Quality Management in Design and Construction
  • Development of Methods for Assessment of Moisture-Originated Damage

Four sections cover fundamentals, applications, construction principles and recommendations, and implementation.
Order your copy today!

 

John P. Lapotaire, CIEC
•Certified Indoor Environmental Consultant
•Microshield Environmental Services, LLC
www.Microshield-ES.com


New ASTM Fungal Growth Standard Provides Go-To Reference for Mold Assessment in Buildings

March 10, 2011

A newly approved standard, ASTM D7338, Guide for the Assessment of Fungal Growth in Buildings, has been developed to provide a go-to reference for anyone testing for mold in buildings. The new standard was developed by Subcommittee D22.08 on Sampling and Analysis of Mold, part of ASTM International Committee D22 on Air Quality.
“The lack of consensus standards in the fungal sampling and analysis practice was the driving force behind establishing D22.08,” says its chairman, Lisa Rogers, president, Mycometer Inc. “All of our efforts are focused on bringing consistency, reliability and accuracy to the practice.”
Rogers notes that ASTM D7338 will be useful to a wide range of stakeholders concerned with mold, including consultants, educators, building owners, insurers, lawyers and others.
In addition to ASTM D7338, D22.08 previously developed ASTM D7391, Test Method for Categorization and Quantification of Airborne Fungal Structures in an Inertial Impaction Sample by Optical Microscopy. Two other proposed new standards developed by the subcommittee are currently on ballot: ASTM WK17177, Test Method for Examination of Fungal Structures on Tape Lift Samples by Optical Microscopy, and ASTM WK22872, Practice for Collection of Total Airborne Fungal Spores via Inertial Impaction Methodology.
“We encourage everyone who has an interest in indoor air quality or mold/fungal assessment, remediation and analysis to get involved in D22.08,” says Rogers. “The work ASTM does in D22 has impact around the world.”
To purchase ASTM standards, visit www.astm.org and search by the standard designation number, or contact ASTM Customer Relations (phone: 610-832-9585; service@astm.org).  ASTM International welcomes and encourages participation in the development of its standards. For more information on becoming an ASTM member, visit www.astm.org/JOIN.
ASTM
Committee D22 Next Meeting: April 10-13, April Committee Week, Anaheim, Calif.
Technical Contact: Lisa Rogers, Mycometer, Inc., Tampa, Fla., Phone: 813-831-6511; lrogers@mycometer.com
ASTM Staff Contact: David Bradley, Phone: 610-832-9681; dbradley@astm.org
ASTM PR Contact: Barbara Schindler, Phone: 610-832-9603; bschindl@astm.org
Release #8788
February 9, 2011

John P. Lapotaire, CIEC
•Certified Indoor Environmental Consultant
•Microshield Environmental Services, LLC
www.Microshield-ES.com


The Push to Repeal the Florida Mold Licensing Law

March 9, 2011

There was wide spread shock among the Mold Professionals, both inspectors and remediators, when Representative Grant introduced HB 4171 in an effort to repeal the current legislation requiring anyone providing mold related services to obtain a license to either preform mold inspections or mold remediation.

You see for the past 7 months both mold inspectors and mold remediators have been working to obtain their mold license.  Some individuals spending hundreds of dollars and some companies thousands.  All in an effort to improve our industry and comply with the current licensing law.

Those who proudly work in the mold industry are eager to improve themselves through education, licensing, and continued education, as required by the current licensing law.  We do this to help provide our client the best possible service in what is almost always a traumatic time of need.

We all submit to finger printing and licensing to show our clients that it is safe to allow us into their home and that they are free to look at our history and report and wrongful acts on our part to either the or their property.

Becoming licensed according to the current licensing law will not make anyone more ethical or force them to provide a better service.

•It does ensure to Citizens of Florida that anyone they are wanting to hire has met the minimal requirements currently required by the State to preform either a Mold Assessment or Mold Remediation on in their home.

•It does provide the Citizens of Florida a window into any licensed mold professionals history as recorded by the State.

•It does provide the Citizens of Florida with a means of reporting wrongful acts committed by a mold professional.

•It does provide a means and a way for the Citizens of Florida to be Informed and Empowered Consumers.

So I have to ask Representative Grant why he wants to repeal the Current Licensing Law.

 

Who’s interest is he looking out for?

 

John P. Lapotaire, CIEC
•Certified Indoor Environmental Consultant
•Microshield Environmental Services, LLC
www.Microshield-ES.com


Licensing and Regulating the Florida Mold Industry

March 9, 2011

Finally, we have regulation in the mold industry.  The mold industry had been an unregulated industry for many years and the citizens of Florida suffered as they were exposed to fraud, scams, and scare tactics.  The citizens of Florida have been preyed upon by mold inspectors who inspect flood and storm damaged property and assesses thousands of dollars of damage that requires their immediate remediation.

There have been many arrests of fraudulent mold contractors as recently as this past February 21st.  It took 29 complaints to the Department of Environmental Protection before action was taken to stop the contractor.  If 1 or 2 complaints had been registered and confirmed by the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation FDBPR.  I feel it safe to assume that most Floridians would not hire the contractor.  None would surely hire him after 10 or 20 registered complaints let alone 29.  By 10 the FDBPR would have taken action revoking the contractor’s license protecting the next 19 from fraud.

Under the current Florida Licensing Law a Licensed Mold Inspector CANNOT provide Mold Remediation.  As of July 1, 2010 the state of Florida Prohibits anyone from performing or offering to perform any mold remediation to a structure on which the mold assessor or the mold assessor’s company provided a mold assessment within the last 12 months

The current Florida Mold Related Services Licensing Law provides a means of reporting these crooked and fraudulent Inspector/Remediators so that the citizens of Florida can be informed about the history of any Mold Inspector or Mold Remediator they hire.

The Florida State Mold Law Legislative purpose.–The Legislature finds it necessary in the interest of the public safety and welfare, to prevent damage to real and personal property, to avert economic injury to the residents of this state, and to regulate persons and companies that hold themselves out to the public as qualified to perform mold-related services.

It’s important for this information to be shared due the recent submittal of HB 4171 February 16th, by Representative James W Grant, District 47.  Representative Grant filed the bill in an effort to repeal the current legislation requiring mold remediators and mold assessors to obtain a state license.  The bill was introduced 7 months after the current law took effect and after approximately 3000 individuals became licensed as either mold remediators or mold inspectors.  With hundreds of additional applicants currently awaiting their license.

The current legislation provides both a means for the Citizens of Florida to report fraudulent acts by mold inspectors and mold remediators and a way for the Citizens of Florida to review the history of any Mold Inspector or Mold Remediator before they make their decision of who to hire.

An Informed Consumer and an industry that can now be held accountable.  Floridians, with the current licensing law, can now self-protect against fraud by either reporting a fraudulent mold inspector or remediator or simply by choosing not to hire a mold inspector or remediator based on the mold inspectors or remediators history of complaints.

I have to ask Representative Grant just what it is about an informed consumer that he is opposed to.  Or could it be someone in the industry that Representative Grant feels should be protected from accountability?

The Mold Related Services Industry is fully in favor of the current Florida Mold Licensing Law.  Thousands of Mold Inspectors and Mold Remediators have spent the last seven months obtaining the necessary training, certification, and insurance necessary to obtain their individual State Mold Assessor License and Mold Remediator License.

There is a push by the Florida Home Builders Association to either repeal the current law or amend the current law to allow licensed general contractors to provide mold inspection and mold remediation without the need for an additional mold inspection or mold remediation license.  I find this very interesting as builders have to be additionally licensed to plumb, roof, provide electric or HVAC service on the homes they build.  Hence the term general contractor.  The General Contractor simply needs to hire a Licensed Professional to perform the mold related services required for the homes they build.  Licensing a Mold Inspector or Mold Remediator is no different than any other trade in the state that is currently required to have a license.

It seems that when it comes to anything resulting from or associated with a possible building or construction flaw the general contractors would rather self police.  I’m sure that their homeowners don’t feel the same way.  The homeowners that I’ve spoken to prefer an independent licensed professional.

Follow the money is the key with the push to repeal the current legislation.

Who hired the Lobbyist?

Who was the Lobbyist?

What is the relationship between the Lobbyist and Representative Grant?

Most important is the “WHY” repeal the New Mold Related services Law?  and,

“WHO” benefits most from the repeal?

I would have to say clearly not the Citizens of Florida who lose their ability to report fraudulent mold inspectors and remediators and make informed decisions regarding who to hire based on the states recorded history of all licensed contractors.  Clearly not the thousands of individuals and businesses involved in the mold related services industry who have already paid for and given their time to become appropriately trained according to the current licensing law and have paid for and obtained the necessary insurance to comply with the current licensing law.

So I ask Representative Grant just “Who’s” Special Interest are you looking out for?

 

John P. Lapotaire, CIEC
•Certified Indoor Environmental Consultant
•Microshield Environmental Services, LLC
www.Microshield-ES.com


VOC Off Gassing – It’s as bad as it sounds

March 4, 2011

The old adage “an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure” applies when referring to indoor air quality. So remember to look for low VOC or VOC free choices when purchasing common household products. Currently there’s no standard labeling system for VOCs, but many manufacturers offer a low or no VOC option. Formaldehyde, one of the best known VOCs, is surprisingly common in new home construction. Luckily, it happens to be one of the few indoor air pollutants that can be readily measured. Air monitoring is one approach that can help prevent adverse effects of exposure to volatile organic compounds.

One study on formaldehyde and VOC levels utilizing air monitoring found that “the levels of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in new homes decreased markedly after 1 year”. This is due primarily to the off-gassing process which diminishes over time. If you don’t happen to have expensive air monitoring equipment lying around, you could always use your sense of smell. Just remember that not all VOCs are detectable with the human nose.

Preventing Exposure to VOCs

Identify, and if possible, remove the source. If it’s not possible to remove, reduce exposure by using a low or no VOC sealant on surfaces and other furnishings emitting chemicals. You should always increase ventilation during the period of VOC off gassing and consider using an air purifier.

Potentially hazardous products often have warnings aimed at reducing exposure to the user. Many people, however, don’t bother to read the label before every use (guilty as charged). If a label states to use the product in a well-ventilated area, go outdoors, open the windows or work in areas equipped with an exhaust fan. You should always provide the maximum amount of clean air flow possible. This rule applies when you are using petroleum-based products, fuels, hydraulic fluids, paint, thinners, cleaning agents and the like. This also applies to your new carpet, new car, air fresheners and a variety of other surprising sources.

Other preventative measures

Safely disposing of empty containers or those with very little product remaining. – Using products according to the manufacturer’s directions. – Buying in quantities that you may consume quickly to prevent additional exposure from seepage or vapors, like paint VOCs, that may escape from poorly sealed containers. – Keeping products out of the reach of children and pets. – Making every effort to utilize integrated pest management techniques when using pesticides. – Never mixing products unless directed on the label. – Choosing low VOC or VOC free products.

Via the Eco Evaluator


Miss the Deadline for Grandfathering into the Florida Mold Licenses?

March 4, 2011

The American Council for Accredited Certification (ACAC) requested that Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation (DBPR) give guidance for those seeking Florida licensing for mold assessor or remediation – who missed the deadline for grandfathering – but have previously taken an ACAC certification examination.  Their response:

Any applicant, who has taken the ACAC proctored examination and passed in any of the categories already approved by Florida as meeting the Florida standards, will be accepted. However, in order to obtain a Florida license in Mold profession, they must also meet the rest of the Florida requirements as stated in Statute Chapter 468, Part XVI, Florida Statutes

 

The categories of ACAC proctored examinations approved are the CIE, CIEC and CMC for the Florida Mold Assessor and CMR, CMRS and CIES for the Florida Mold Remediator.

Please call the ACAC staff toll-free at 888-808-8381 for additional information.


LEED NC 2009 IEQc4.2: Low-Emitting Materials—Paints and Coatings

March 4, 2011

An easy, no-cost credit

Like the similar credit, IEQc4.1: Low-Emitting Materials: Adhesives and Sealants, it shouldn’t cost you anything extra to earn this credit—it will just take some work. Your first priority should be to specify only  paints and coatings that comply with the credit’s VOC limits, and enforce those specifications on the jobsite. Research low-VOC paints and coatings before construction begins and provide lists of acceptable materials to contractors to help ensure that the right products are used.

Performance should not be an issue

Major manufacturers offer paints and coatings that are just as durable and perform just as well as their higher-VOC…

Verify Your Information

Don’t allow the use of products that merely claim to be “low VOC.” Everyone specifying and purchasing products must actually find the products’ VOC content in grams per liter (g/L), which is usually found on the product’s technical data sheet or material safety data sheet, and compare that number with VOC limits listed for different uses determined by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Rule #1113 and Green Seal GS-11 and GS-03.

Only 20% of product cut sheets selected at random need to be uploaded to LEED Online to document this credit although it is best to keep all product cut sheets on file in case the credit is audited.

 

John P. Lapotaire, CIEC
•Certified Indoor Environmental Consultant
•Microshield Environmental Services, LLC
www.Microshield-ES.com


Do It Yourself Mold Test Kits

March 3, 2011

Do It Yourself Mold Test Kits Earn a Not Recommended Rating from Consumer Reports.

If you see or smell mold, you don’t need a test kit to tell you it’s there. Generally, it’s not necessary to identify the species of mold growing in your home, according to the national Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

If mold covers an area less than 10 square feet, you may be able to eliminate the problem yourself. Larger areas require a pro. When we tested the kits below for our report, we found significant shortcomings in all of them, flaws that were serious enough to earn each a “Not Recommended” Rating.