This Week on IAQ Radio

February 4, 2011

Buck Sheppard, ASCS

NADCA President on Dateline Duct Cleaning Expose


This week HVAC cleaning veteran Buck Sheppard will discuss HVAC cleaning issues and the recent Dateline NBC expose on duct cleaning bait and switch scams.  The news release from NADCA states “NADCA participated in an undercover investigation by Chris Hanson and Dateline NBC to expose companies that use bait and switch tactics to take advantage of consumers.  The investigation culminated in a segment that aired January 30, 2011, featuring NADCA President Buck Sheppard as the industry expert.  After witnessing one of the scam operators in action, Sheppard was taken aback.”

Join IAQ Radio every Friday at noon to LEARN MORE about HVAC cleaning, bait and switch scams, what can be done to stop them and more on IAQ Radio!

Join Now

•John P. Lapotaire, CIEC
•Certified Indoor Environmental Consultant
•Microshield Environmental Services, LLC
www.Microshield-ES.com


Mold-Related Services Licensing Program

February 4, 2011

What can I do now to prepare myself for licensure?

Because Chapter  468, Part XVI, Florida Statutes providing for licensure and grandfathering  did not go into effect until July 1, 2010, the department did not have  authority  to approve any courses or examinations prior to that  date. We have approved the Council for Accredited Certification (ACAC) exams and are now   accepting course applications. To access the applications, click this APPLY link (or use the APPLY button on the navigation menu above).

To avoid the time and expense involved with taking  a potentially unapproved course, it is recommended that persons wishing  to become licensed should wait for the  department’s approval of course applications before taking any steps toward licensing.

•John P. Lapotaire, CIEC
•Certified Indoor Environmental Consultant
•Microshield Environmental Services, LLC
www.Microshield-ES.com


IESO 3210/Standard Guide for the Inspection of an Educational Facility for Moisture Intrusion and Mold Growth

February 4, 2011

DESCRIPTION:
The purpose is to provide standardized procedures to be used for the investigation of educational structures for readily observable mold or conditions associated with mold amplification. The initial investigative process includes, but is not limited to, initial information gathering, documentation of relevant historical events and observations from an on-site walk-through. There are four potential outcomes: Neither mold nor associated conditions were readily observable. Mold was not readily observable but associated conditions were. Mold was readily observed but no associated conditions were. Readily observed mold and conditions. Outcomes 2, 3 or 4 may warrant additional investigation by a qualified professional.


•John P. Lapotaire, CIEC
•Certified Indoor Environmental Consultant
•Microshield Environmental Services, LLC
www.Microshield-ES.com



National Safe and Healthy Housing Coalition Approves 2011 Policy Agenda

February 3, 2011

In January, the National Safe and Healthy Housing Coalition approved its policy agenda for FY2011 to guide its policy work. The Policy Agenda focuses on three main areas: Developing National Healthy Housing Standards; Increasing Financing Options for Healthy Housing; and Integrating Energy Efficiency and Health.

In 2010, the Coalition made the case for effective healthy housing policy in meetings with Congressional and Obama Administration leaders and in comments on emerging health, environmental, and housing programs and regulations. The Coalition:

  • Advocated for Senator Jack Reed’s healthy homes legislation (S.1658 and H.R.3891) grants for community-level code enforcement (S.970 and H.R.2246) resulting in their introduction in the House and their inclusion in broader legislation for livable communities and green affordable housing.
  • Countered attacks on EPA’s Renovation, Repair and Painting Rule (RRP) with calls for improved capacity and implementation without delay.
  • Held its first annual meeting, bringing together a diverse group of practitioners and advocates to consider the next steps in advancing healthy housing.
  • Hosted briefings for US House and Senate staff in the Capitol that highlighted breakthroughs in federal policy and at the local community level.
  • Continued to convene working groups to focus on essential targets for policy action.

To review the full the FY11 Policy Agenda, please  click here.

 

•John P. Lapotaire, CIEC
•Certified Indoor Environmental Consultant
•Microshield Environmental Services, LLC
www.Microshield-ES.com


DOE Issues New Health and Safety Guidance for Weatherization Assistance Programs

February 3, 2011

On January 12, 2011 the Department of Energy (DOE) issued new Health and Safety Guidance for its Weatherization Assistance Program (WAP) grantees. The new guidance provides recommendations to grantees as they develop their health and safety plans and procedures. When making decisions on how to address health and safety issues during weatherization work, this document will be a critical reference.

 

Here are some of the highlights of the guidance regarding specific health and safety activities and allowable costs:

 

Asbestos/Vermiculite – When vermiculite is present, unless testing determines otherwise, take precautionary measures as if it contains asbestos; do not use blower door tests or personal air monitoring while in attics. Encapsulation by an appropriately trained asbestos control professional is allowed. Removal is not allowed.  Testing: Assess whether vermiculite is present. Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act of 1986 (AHERA) certified prescriptive sampling is allowed by a certified tester.

  • Mold – Remediation of conditions that may lead to or promote biological concerns is allowable; visual assessment required; provide client education. Where severe mold and moisture issues cannot be addressed, deferral is required. Testing: Visual assessment is required and diagnostics such as moisture meters are recommended prior to final inspection. Mold testing is not an allowable cost.
  • Building Structure and Roofing:  Building rehabilitation is beyond the scope of WAP. Homes with conditions that require more than incidental repair should be deferred. Testing: Visual inspection. Ensure that access to areas necessary for weatherization is safe for entry and performance of assessment, work, and inspection.
  • Combustion Safety – Proper venting to the outside for combustion appliances, including gas dryers is required. Correction of venting is allowed when testing indicates a problem. Testing: Combustion safety testing is required when combustion appliances are present. Inspect venting of combustion appliances and confirm adequate clearances. Test naturally drafting appliances for draft and spillage under worst case conditions before and after air tightening. Inspect cooking burners for operability and flame quality.
  • Formaldehyde, Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) and other air pollutants – Removal is allowed if required and if there is a risk to workers; client education is recommended.
  • Injury Prevention – Take reasonable precautions to prevent worker risks; conduct minor repairs when needed to weatherize homes; client education is recommended.
  • Lead-Based Paint– Follow EPA’s Renovation, Repair and Painting (RRP) guidelines. Testing is an allowable expense. Note: This guideline is a change.
  • Pests – Pest removal is allowed where infestation would prevent weatherization. Screening windows and points of access allowable to prevent intrusion (see Table for allowances); assessment of pest presence recommended.
  • Radon – When conditions permit, exposed dirt must be covered with a vapor barrier except for mobile homes; in homes where radon may be present, precautions should be taken to reduce the likeliness of making radon worse. Testing: may be allowed in locations with high radon potential. Training recommended.
  • Smoke/CO Alarms – These are allowable expenses; client education is recommended.
  • Spray Polyurethane Foam – Must use EPA recommendations when working within the conditioned space. Click here for full list of EPA recommendations.
  • Ventilation – Following 2010 American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASRAE) 62.2 is required to the fullest extent possible; ASRAE 62.2 is not required where acceptable air quality exists as defined by 62.2. The 2010 update encourages home retrofits to improve indoor air quality through allowance of alternative methods for meeting the current standard requirement of having exhaust fans in the kitchen and bathroom. Testing: 62.2 Evaluation; fan flow; then conduct follow up testing.

Click here for the complete guidance.

 

•John P. Lapotaire, CIEC
•Certified Indoor Environmental Consultant
•Microshield Environmental Services, LLC
www.Microshield-ES.com


Palm Beach County schools wage never-ending battle against mold

October 21, 2010

Thousands of indoor air quality complaints in past three years, but officials say safety programs working.

Before the start of school last year, moldy and water-stained ceiling tiles were found in two classrooms, and moldy drywall in a third room at Northmore Elementary in West Palm Beach.

The problems were fixed quickly, but the case was far from an isolated incident across the Palm Beach County School District, records show.

During the 2009-10 school year, administrators handled 977 maintenance work orders to address indoor-air quality problems ranging from “sewer odors” to high humidity to water leaks.

A Sun Sentinel/Orlando Sentinel investigation reviewed thousands of cases involving moldy classrooms, health-related complaints from teachers and students, and responses and actions by school officials. While the school district has received national recognition for a pro-active measures in addressing mold issues, some problems persist.

In Palm Beach County, reports from July 2007 to June 2010 point to a never-ending battle being waged against mold that infests classrooms, bathrooms, offices and and even school clinics. Among the findings:

Clifford O. Taylor/Kirklane Elementary in Palm Springs: A summer 2007 inspection validated years of complaints by parents and teachers about repeated flooding, roof failures and mold. The school, built in 1970, is improved now thanks to a $40.7 million modernization last year.

Olympic Heights High west of Boca Raton: Surface mold in nine classrooms was reported after school started in Aug. 2008.

Coral Sunset Elementary west of Boca Raton: In June 2009, a district carpenter was called in to remove 48-foot-long moldy cabinets from two walls in the school’s clinic.

Okeeheelee Middle in Greenacres: Surface mold in four classrooms was reported in Oct. 2009.

Independence Middle in Jupiter: In April, a staff member’s illness resulted in the discovery of “very dirty & moldy” parts of the air conditioning system for the physical education office.

Administrators insist schools are safe, and the volume of complaints is normal considering the region’s warm weather, the potential for building leaks, and the district’s inventory of 1,420 buildings and 27.2 million square-feet of facilities.

“I don’t think these issues will ever go away,” said Joseph Sanches, facilities management chief. “We live in a high-humidity area.”

A proactive approach to building maintenance — such as using environmentally friendly materials and cleaning chemicals, and proper cooling procedures — has reduced the potential for problems and the number of incidents, he said. It also helps that the district has built or replaced 141 schools since 1989.

The district wants to know if someone has a problem, and even solicits indoor air quality complaints.

“We welcome the calls,” Sanches said. “We respond to issues immediately. We would be at fault if people pointed these things out and we didn’t respond.”

Just three years ago, the district celebrated recognition for being among the best school systems in the nation at improving the air breathed by students and teachers.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency named the district one of five winners of a “National Model of Sustained Excellence” award for achievement in “maintaining healthy educational facilities.” That followed a similar honor from the agency in 2003.

In addition, 96 of the district’s 186 schools have received the ” Asthma-Friendly” designation from the American Lung Association in recent years.

Chris Skerlec, the district’s environmental control director, said the district has maintained these high standards even as the maintenance work orders keep coming: 3,536 in three years.

“We still end up with windows that leak and roofs that leak. We end up with cracks in buildings,” he said.

After the district had won acclaim for its approach, the School Board sought to keep it going by adopting its first Indoor Air Quality policy two years ago.

“It is the intent of the School Board that the District will consider the most current, proven technologies in the fields of health, safety and environmental sciences,” the policy states.

The district is largely on its own in setting its indoor air practices because there are no state laws governing how schools should monitor, detect and handle mold build-up and other indoor air quality issues in these buildings.
School districts are not required to tell anyone about the problem — not even the local health department — despite a growing body of knowledge that mold can be especially harmful to children.

Last year, Palm Beach County schools paid $164,728 to outside contractors specialized in indoor-air quality repairs and projects. The district spent another $13,550 to hire consultants to investigate certain complaints and to oversee contractors. Still more funds went to staff salaries for technicians in Skerlec’s office, and for district maintenance crews to handle work orders.

The Florida Department of Education has acknowledged that about half of the state’s public schools are burdened with environmental issues. But it would be expensive to fix them — an estimated $70 million just to start, according to a legislative report written in 2004, the last time the state took a serious look at the issue.

Not only would repairs be pricey, Florida could be setting itself up for lawsuits if it identifies those problems, wrote the Senate analyst who compiled the report.

A national study by the University of Central Florida found that extra funding for repairs and maintenance projects alone might not solve the problem.

School districts do not want it publicized that they have mold problems.

“There is often a greater desire to hide problems than have them resolved,” wrote the UCF researchers who, in 2006, found that schools in Florida, Texas, New York and three other states had chronic problems with mold, humidity and odors.

Palm Beach County’s history with mold and classrooms dates to highly publicized problems in the 1990s.

Staff members and parents complained for years about poor air quality at 19 schools that the now-defunct W. R. Frizzell Architects designed in the late 1980s and early 1990s. The air conditioners failed to remove enough moisture from the air, which led to mold and mildew. The district spent more than $50 million to replace all the systems, beginning in 1996.

Denise Robinette, a parent from Jupiter, has been a long-standing advocate to educate the public about poor indoor air quality through her HealthyLiving Foundation, a nonprofit organization.

In late 2002, she and her ex-husband sued the Palm Beach County School District, alleging that faulty maintenance of school ventilation systems made their sons sick. The case has since been settled out of court.

“Mold is a four letter word when it comes to schools,” she said. “If my kids didn’t get sick, I never would have believed the consequences of indoor air quality. These issues are real. Kids are getting illnesses they will have for the rest of their lives.”

In the past decade, more parents have spoken out about schools that seemed to make their youngsters sick.

Many times those districts did not make a concerted effort to fix problems until lawyers got involved, said South Florida attorney Scott Gelfand. He represented several Broward County students and school employees who sued that district in 2002.

The State Attorney’s Office in Broward investigated and brought its findings to a grand jury, which released a scathing report criticizing school officials not only for dragging their feet on getting rid of mold but also for having schools so poorly constructed and maintained that they constantly leaked.

Broward spent millions of dollars on repairs, but a number of statewide changes the grand jury recommended never happened.

Richard J. Shaughnessy, director of The University of Tulsa Indoor Air Program and one of America’s foremost air quality experts, said the situation might not change unless the public pushes the issue.

“It has to start,” Shaughnessy said, “with parents becoming involved and demanding that schools address these types of problems across the country.”

• John P. Lapotaire, CIEC
• Certified Indoor Environmental Consultant
• Microshield Environmental Services, LLC
www.Microshield-ES.com