The Push to Repeal the Florida Mold Licensing Law

March 9, 2011

There was wide spread shock among the Mold Professionals, both inspectors and remediators, when Representative Grant introduced HB 4171 in an effort to repeal the current legislation requiring anyone providing mold related services to obtain a license to either preform mold inspections or mold remediation.

You see for the past 7 months both mold inspectors and mold remediators have been working to obtain their mold license.  Some individuals spending hundreds of dollars and some companies thousands.  All in an effort to improve our industry and comply with the current licensing law.

Those who proudly work in the mold industry are eager to improve themselves through education, licensing, and continued education, as required by the current licensing law.  We do this to help provide our client the best possible service in what is almost always a traumatic time of need.

We all submit to finger printing and licensing to show our clients that it is safe to allow us into their home and that they are free to look at our history and report and wrongful acts on our part to either the or their property.

Becoming licensed according to the current licensing law will not make anyone more ethical or force them to provide a better service.

•It does ensure to Citizens of Florida that anyone they are wanting to hire has met the minimal requirements currently required by the State to preform either a Mold Assessment or Mold Remediation on in their home.

•It does provide the Citizens of Florida a window into any licensed mold professionals history as recorded by the State.

•It does provide the Citizens of Florida with a means of reporting wrongful acts committed by a mold professional.

•It does provide a means and a way for the Citizens of Florida to be Informed and Empowered Consumers.

So I have to ask Representative Grant why he wants to repeal the Current Licensing Law.

 

Who’s interest is he looking out for?

 

John P. Lapotaire, CIEC
•Certified Indoor Environmental Consultant
•Microshield Environmental Services, LLC
www.Microshield-ES.com


Licensing and Regulating the Florida Mold Industry

March 9, 2011

Finally, we have regulation in the mold industry.  The mold industry had been an unregulated industry for many years and the citizens of Florida suffered as they were exposed to fraud, scams, and scare tactics.  The citizens of Florida have been preyed upon by mold inspectors who inspect flood and storm damaged property and assesses thousands of dollars of damage that requires their immediate remediation.

There have been many arrests of fraudulent mold contractors as recently as this past February 21st.  It took 29 complaints to the Department of Environmental Protection before action was taken to stop the contractor.  If 1 or 2 complaints had been registered and confirmed by the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation FDBPR.  I feel it safe to assume that most Floridians would not hire the contractor.  None would surely hire him after 10 or 20 registered complaints let alone 29.  By 10 the FDBPR would have taken action revoking the contractor’s license protecting the next 19 from fraud.

Under the current Florida Licensing Law a Licensed Mold Inspector CANNOT provide Mold Remediation.  As of July 1, 2010 the state of Florida Prohibits anyone from performing or offering to perform any mold remediation to a structure on which the mold assessor or the mold assessor’s company provided a mold assessment within the last 12 months

The current Florida Mold Related Services Licensing Law provides a means of reporting these crooked and fraudulent Inspector/Remediators so that the citizens of Florida can be informed about the history of any Mold Inspector or Mold Remediator they hire.

The Florida State Mold Law Legislative purpose.–The Legislature finds it necessary in the interest of the public safety and welfare, to prevent damage to real and personal property, to avert economic injury to the residents of this state, and to regulate persons and companies that hold themselves out to the public as qualified to perform mold-related services.

It’s important for this information to be shared due the recent submittal of HB 4171 February 16th, by Representative James W Grant, District 47.  Representative Grant filed the bill in an effort to repeal the current legislation requiring mold remediators and mold assessors to obtain a state license.  The bill was introduced 7 months after the current law took effect and after approximately 3000 individuals became licensed as either mold remediators or mold inspectors.  With hundreds of additional applicants currently awaiting their license.

The current legislation provides both a means for the Citizens of Florida to report fraudulent acts by mold inspectors and mold remediators and a way for the Citizens of Florida to review the history of any Mold Inspector or Mold Remediator before they make their decision of who to hire.

An Informed Consumer and an industry that can now be held accountable.  Floridians, with the current licensing law, can now self-protect against fraud by either reporting a fraudulent mold inspector or remediator or simply by choosing not to hire a mold inspector or remediator based on the mold inspectors or remediators history of complaints.

I have to ask Representative Grant just what it is about an informed consumer that he is opposed to.  Or could it be someone in the industry that Representative Grant feels should be protected from accountability?

The Mold Related Services Industry is fully in favor of the current Florida Mold Licensing Law.  Thousands of Mold Inspectors and Mold Remediators have spent the last seven months obtaining the necessary training, certification, and insurance necessary to obtain their individual State Mold Assessor License and Mold Remediator License.

There is a push by the Florida Home Builders Association to either repeal the current law or amend the current law to allow licensed general contractors to provide mold inspection and mold remediation without the need for an additional mold inspection or mold remediation license.  I find this very interesting as builders have to be additionally licensed to plumb, roof, provide electric or HVAC service on the homes they build.  Hence the term general contractor.  The General Contractor simply needs to hire a Licensed Professional to perform the mold related services required for the homes they build.  Licensing a Mold Inspector or Mold Remediator is no different than any other trade in the state that is currently required to have a license.

It seems that when it comes to anything resulting from or associated with a possible building or construction flaw the general contractors would rather self police.  I’m sure that their homeowners don’t feel the same way.  The homeowners that I’ve spoken to prefer an independent licensed professional.

Follow the money is the key with the push to repeal the current legislation.

Who hired the Lobbyist?

Who was the Lobbyist?

What is the relationship between the Lobbyist and Representative Grant?

Most important is the “WHY” repeal the New Mold Related services Law?  and,

“WHO” benefits most from the repeal?

I would have to say clearly not the Citizens of Florida who lose their ability to report fraudulent mold inspectors and remediators and make informed decisions regarding who to hire based on the states recorded history of all licensed contractors.  Clearly not the thousands of individuals and businesses involved in the mold related services industry who have already paid for and given their time to become appropriately trained according to the current licensing law and have paid for and obtained the necessary insurance to comply with the current licensing law.

So I ask Representative Grant just “Who’s” Special Interest are you looking out for?

 

John P. Lapotaire, CIEC
•Certified Indoor Environmental Consultant
•Microshield Environmental Services, LLC
www.Microshield-ES.com


VOC Off Gassing – It’s as bad as it sounds

March 4, 2011

The old adage “an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure” applies when referring to indoor air quality. So remember to look for low VOC or VOC free choices when purchasing common household products. Currently there’s no standard labeling system for VOCs, but many manufacturers offer a low or no VOC option. Formaldehyde, one of the best known VOCs, is surprisingly common in new home construction. Luckily, it happens to be one of the few indoor air pollutants that can be readily measured. Air monitoring is one approach that can help prevent adverse effects of exposure to volatile organic compounds.

One study on formaldehyde and VOC levels utilizing air monitoring found that “the levels of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in new homes decreased markedly after 1 year”. This is due primarily to the off-gassing process which diminishes over time. If you don’t happen to have expensive air monitoring equipment lying around, you could always use your sense of smell. Just remember that not all VOCs are detectable with the human nose.

Preventing Exposure to VOCs

Identify, and if possible, remove the source. If it’s not possible to remove, reduce exposure by using a low or no VOC sealant on surfaces and other furnishings emitting chemicals. You should always increase ventilation during the period of VOC off gassing and consider using an air purifier.

Potentially hazardous products often have warnings aimed at reducing exposure to the user. Many people, however, don’t bother to read the label before every use (guilty as charged). If a label states to use the product in a well-ventilated area, go outdoors, open the windows or work in areas equipped with an exhaust fan. You should always provide the maximum amount of clean air flow possible. This rule applies when you are using petroleum-based products, fuels, hydraulic fluids, paint, thinners, cleaning agents and the like. This also applies to your new carpet, new car, air fresheners and a variety of other surprising sources.

Other preventative measures

Safely disposing of empty containers or those with very little product remaining. – Using products according to the manufacturer’s directions. – Buying in quantities that you may consume quickly to prevent additional exposure from seepage or vapors, like paint VOCs, that may escape from poorly sealed containers. – Keeping products out of the reach of children and pets. – Making every effort to utilize integrated pest management techniques when using pesticides. – Never mixing products unless directed on the label. – Choosing low VOC or VOC free products.

Via the Eco Evaluator


Miss the Deadline for Grandfathering into the Florida Mold Licenses?

March 4, 2011

The American Council for Accredited Certification (ACAC) requested that Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation (DBPR) give guidance for those seeking Florida licensing for mold assessor or remediation – who missed the deadline for grandfathering – but have previously taken an ACAC certification examination.  Their response:

Any applicant, who has taken the ACAC proctored examination and passed in any of the categories already approved by Florida as meeting the Florida standards, will be accepted. However, in order to obtain a Florida license in Mold profession, they must also meet the rest of the Florida requirements as stated in Statute Chapter 468, Part XVI, Florida Statutes

 

The categories of ACAC proctored examinations approved are the CIE, CIEC and CMC for the Florida Mold Assessor and CMR, CMRS and CIES for the Florida Mold Remediator.

Please call the ACAC staff toll-free at 888-808-8381 for additional information.


LEED NC 2009 IEQc4.2: Low-Emitting Materials—Paints and Coatings

March 4, 2011

An easy, no-cost credit

Like the similar credit, IEQc4.1: Low-Emitting Materials: Adhesives and Sealants, it shouldn’t cost you anything extra to earn this credit—it will just take some work. Your first priority should be to specify only  paints and coatings that comply with the credit’s VOC limits, and enforce those specifications on the jobsite. Research low-VOC paints and coatings before construction begins and provide lists of acceptable materials to contractors to help ensure that the right products are used.

Performance should not be an issue

Major manufacturers offer paints and coatings that are just as durable and perform just as well as their higher-VOC…

Verify Your Information

Don’t allow the use of products that merely claim to be “low VOC.” Everyone specifying and purchasing products must actually find the products’ VOC content in grams per liter (g/L), which is usually found on the product’s technical data sheet or material safety data sheet, and compare that number with VOC limits listed for different uses determined by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Rule #1113 and Green Seal GS-11 and GS-03.

Only 20% of product cut sheets selected at random need to be uploaded to LEED Online to document this credit although it is best to keep all product cut sheets on file in case the credit is audited.

 

John P. Lapotaire, CIEC
•Certified Indoor Environmental Consultant
•Microshield Environmental Services, LLC
www.Microshield-ES.com


Do It Yourself Mold Test Kits

March 3, 2011

Do It Yourself Mold Test Kits Earn a Not Recommended Rating from Consumer Reports.

If you see or smell mold, you don’t need a test kit to tell you it’s there. Generally, it’s not necessary to identify the species of mold growing in your home, according to the national Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

If mold covers an area less than 10 square feet, you may be able to eliminate the problem yourself. Larger areas require a pro. When we tested the kits below for our report, we found significant shortcomings in all of them, flaws that were serious enough to earn each a “Not Recommended” Rating.


Grandfatering for Your Florida Mold License has Ended!

March 2, 2011

Grandfathering Ended Yesterday!

If you didn’t apply for your Florida Mold License under the Grandfathering clause you’ve run out of time.

The requirements for grandfathering as amended by House Bill 713 include submission of an application to the department by March 1, 2011, whether postmarked or delivered by that date. Applicants must meet the following licensure requirements:

Applicants applying for their Florida Mold Assessor or Mold Remediator License will now be required to either apply through Exam or Endorsement.

1. Mold Assessor – Initial License by Examination

This application is used by individuals who have passed at least one of the examinations offered by The American Council for Accredited Certification (ACAC). The department has approved the following examinations: Council-certified Indoor Environmentalist (CIE) examination, Council-certified Indoor Environmental Consultant (CIEC) examination, and Council-certified Microbial Consultant (CMC) examination.

Application Requirements:

•  EXAMINATION: Individuals seeking licensure as a mold assessor must first take and pass one of the examinations approved by the department and administered by the American Council for Accredited Certification (ACAC), in computer based testing format. To contact the American Council for Accredited Certification please call 1-888-808-8381 or go to the website at http://www.acac.org. Please refer to the application instructions for information regarding the administration of the examination.

•  EDUCATION/EXPERIENCE: A copy of a transcript is required demonstrating an Associate of Arts degree or higher with at least 30 credit hours in microbiology, engineering, architecture, industrial hygiene or occupational safety or related field of science from an accredited institution. The applicant must also demonstrate a minimum of 1 year of documented field experience in microbial sampling or investigations, and documented training in water, mold and respiratory protection;

or

a high school diploma and 4 years of experience under the supervision of a Florida licensed mold assessor or remediator. This is not a complete listing of educational and experience requirements. Please see the application instructions page for complete information.

•  FINGERPRINTS: An applicant must have a background check as part of the licensing process. To learn more about fingerprinting, please visit our fingerprint FAQs.

•  INSURANCE: Applicants for a Mold Assessor license are required to attest that they have obtained general liability and errors and omissions insurance for both preliminary and post remediation mold assessment in the amount of no less than $1 million dollars as determined by statute.

•  FEE: Pay the required fee as provided in the application, payable to the Department of Business and Professional Regulation.

•  APPLICATION: Complete the application by clicking on the “Printable Application” link at the bottom of the page.

•  MORE INFORMATION: Learn more about this profession’s application requirements (use the back button or arrow to return to this page).

2.  Mold Assessor – Initial License for Out-of-state Applicants (Endorsement)

This application is used by individuals who qualify for licensure by having passed a certification examination offered by a nationally recognized organization that is substantially equivalent to Florida’s examination; or hold a valid license by another state or territory of the United States whose criteria for licensure are substantially equivalent to Florida’s licensing requirements.

Application Requirements:

•  DEFINITION: Endorsement is licensure of individuals who hold a valid license in another state and would like to become licensed in Florida based on their out-of-state license or provide proof of passing a certification examination offered by a nationally recognized organization that certifies persons in mold remediation or assessment, and the examination has been approved by the department as substantially equivalent to Florida’s examination.

•  OUT-OF-STATE LICENSE: Submit proof of licensure in another state whose criteria for licensure are substantially equivalent to Florida’s requirements

or

NATIONALLY RECOGNIZED ORGANIZATION: Provide proof of passing a certification examination offered by a nationally recognized organization that is substantially equivalent to Florida’s examination that is recognized by the department. If you passed a certification examination by a nationally recognized organization that is substantially equivalent to the Florida’s examination and you do not have an out-of-state license, then you must submit:

•  a copy of a transcript demonstrating an Associate of Arts degree or higher in microbiology, engineering, architecture, industrial hygiene or occupational safety or related field of science from an accredited institution. The applicant must also demonstrate a minimum of 1 year of documented field experience in microbial sampling or investigations;

or

•  a high school diploma and provide proof of 4 years experience under the supervision of a Florida licensed mold assessor or remediator; This is not a complete listing of educational and experience requirements. Please see the application instructions page for complete information.

•  EDUCATION/EXPERIENCE: If you passed a certification examination by a nationally recognized organization that is substantially equivalent to the Florida’s examination and you do not have an out-of-state license, then you must submit a copy of a transcript demonstrating an Associate of Arts degree or higher in microbiology, engineering, architecture, industrial hygiene or occupational safety or related field of science from an accredited institution. The applicant must also demonstrate a minimum of 1 year of documented field experience in microbial sampling or investigations;

or

a high school diploma and provide proof of 4 years experience under the supervision of a Florida licensed mold assessor or remediator. This is not a complete listing of educational and experience requirements. Please see the application instructions page for complete information.

•  FINGERPRINTS: An applicant must have a background check as part of the licensing process. To learn more about fingerprinting, please visit our fingerprint FAQs.

•  INSURANCE: Applicants for a Mold Assessor license are required to attest that they have obtained general liability and errors and omissions insurance for both preliminary and post remediation mold assessment in the amount of $1 million dollars as determined by statute.

•  FEE: Pay the required fee as provided in the application, payable to the Department of Business and Professional Regulation.

•  APPLICATION: Complete the application by clicking on the “Printable Application” link at the bottom of the page.

•  MORE INFORMATION: Learn more about this profession’s application requirements (use the back button or arrow to return to this page).

 

John P. Lapotaire, CIEC
•Certified Indoor Environmental Consultant
•Microshield Environmental Services, LLC
www.Microshield-ES.com

 


LEED v3 IEQ 3.2 What and how to measure?

March 1, 2011

Is Green Really Low VOC?

Just what is behind the LEED Green Curtain?

I do my very best to stay off the soap box when it comes to USGBC LEED and IEQ or more specifically IAQ.  I usually stay clear of this topic but I just can’t avoid speaking up once again.

LEED v3 for New Construction IEQ Credit 3.2   (page 64)

<https://www.usgbc.org/ShowFile.aspx?DocumentID=8868>

Intent of this credit isn’t to confirm, as you may think, the buildings actual use of the USGBC prescribed Low-Emitting Materials described in IEQ Credit 4.1, but to reduce indoor air quality (IAQ) problems resulting from construction or renovation and to promote the comfort and well-being of construction workers and building occupants. As described in the LEED documents page 66,

It may sound the same but until the IEQ Credit 3.2 becomes a Prerequisite it just a nice thought that looks good in print.

If the requirement did become a Prerequisite the sampling method would then need to be enforced.  Yes enforced.  The use of a MiniRae PID in a few locations doesn’t even come close the the methods described in the USGBC .Rating System Updated February 2011.

I have been working with LEED from the very beginning and I have provided LEED

3.2 testing in accordance with the Rating System many times.  I have provided many LEED and Indoor Air Quality presentations and discussions to USGBC Chapters and National Assoc. of Home Builders Chapters discussing these very issues.  The concern with the builders and general contractors is paying for the testing that may actually show that the building has an elevation in one or more of the USGBC Rating System Contaminant Maximum Concentration limits.  This actually happens much, much more that most would admit.  The result is that most simply ignore if not avoid the 3.2 Credit option 2 Air Sampling.

As a result of this avoidance, due to recent developments, and even though USGBC officially does not endorse one method over another,  the USGBC has allowed the use of handheld PID’s to measure TVOC’s.  The USGBC does this even though they have been made aware that using photoionization detectors (PID’s) to measure TVOC’s in buildings does not meet the minimum 4-hour sampling period required in the Rating System page 65.

This was an effort on behalf of the USGBC to encourage more contractors to actually pursue the 1 point in the entire USGBC Rating System that can confirm the use of the USGBC prescribed Low-Emitting Materials.  Something they are currently in serious need of confirming.

I continue to provide the LEED 3.2 point to my clients who are to actually wanting to earn the credit and confirm the buildings IEQ status using the USGBC required sampling methods.

I refuse to change my sampling protocols to those recently being used by others that require only a snapshot of the indoor environment using handheld PID samplers.

I choose not to provide anything less than the sampling methods that meet the USGBC’s Rating System requirements as described on page 65 of the LEED v3 LEED for New Construction launched on April 27, 2009, including an upgrade of LEED for New Construction under the suite of LEED 2009 rating systems. LEED for New Construction 2009 is served by the Green Building Design and Construction Reference Guide.

Pass or Fail the USGBC set their Standard.  I only measure the indoor environment according to their standard and encourage all others to do the same thing.

Go ahead take a peek at what is actually behind the curtain.

 

The USGBC sampling is described as follows.

OPTION 2. Air Testing

Conduct baseline IAQ testing after construction ends and prior to occupancy using testing protocols consistent with the EPA Compendium of Methods for the Determination of Air Pollutants in Indoor Air and as additionally detailed in the LEED Reference Guide for Green Building Design and Construction, 2009 Edition.

Demonstrate that the contaminant maximum concentration levels listed below are not exceeded:

Contaminant Maximum Concentration

•Formaldehyde 27 parts per billion

•Particulates (PM10) 50 micrograms per cubic meter

•Total volatile organic compounds (TVOCs) 500 micrograms per cubic meter

•4-Phenylcyclohexene (4-PCH)* 6.5 micrograms per cubic meter

•Carbon monoxide (CO) 9 part per million and no greater than 2 parts per million above outdoor levels

For each sampling point where the maximum concentration limits are exceeded, conduct an additional flush-out with outside air and retest the non-compliant concentrations. Repeat until all requirements are met. When retesting non-compliant building areas, take samples from the same locations as in the first test, although it is not required.

Conduct the air sample testing as follows:

•All measurements must be conducted prior to occupancy, but during normal occupied hours with the building ventilation system started at the normal daily start time and operated at the minimum outside air flow rate for the occupied mode throughout the test.

•All interior finishes must be installed, including but not limited to millwork, doors, paint, carpet and acoustic tiles. Movable furnishings such as workstations and partitions should be in place for the testing, although it is not required.

•The number of sampling locations will depend on the size of the building and number of ventilation systems. For each portion of the building served by a separate ventilation system, the number of sampling points must not be less than 1 per 25,000 sq ft or for each contiguous floor area, whichever is larger.

•Include areas with the least ventilation and greatest presumed source strength.

•Air samples must be collected between 3 and 6 feet from the floor to represent the breathing zone of occupants, and over a minimum 4-hour period.

 

John P. Lapotaire, CIEC
•Certified Indoor Environmental Consultant
•Microshield Environmental Services, LLC
www.Microshield-ES.com


Florida Mold Licensing Grandfathering Program Ends Today

March 1, 2011

Grandfathering Ends Today!

If you haven’t applied for your Florida Mold License under the Grandfathering clause You’re about to run out of time.

The requirements for grandfathering as amended by House Bill 713 include submission of an application to the department by March 1, 2011, whether postmarked or delivered by that date. Applicants must meet the following licensure requirements:

  • Certification by a state or national association that requires successful completion of a proctored exam for certification and completion of at least 60 hours of verifiable education for an assessor and 30 hours of education for a remediator;

or

  • At the time of application, have at least 3 years of experience as a mold assessor or mold remediator. To establish the 3 years of experience, an applicant must submit at least 40 invoices for mold assessment or mold remediation prepared by the applicant. The department may investigate the validity of a mold invoice and, if the applicant submits a false invoice, may take disciplinary action.

An applicant for licensure must submit to a criminal background check and be of good moral character. Mold assessors must also obtain a $1,000,000 insurance policy to cover both preliminary and post-remediation assessment.

An applicant may not qualify for licensure by grandfathering if he or she has had a mold assessor or remediator license or a license in any related field from Florida or any other state revoked at any time or suspended within the previous 5 years or has been assessed a fine that exceeds $500 within the previous 5 years. A license in a related field includes, but is not limited to, licensure in real estate, construction, home inspections services, or building code administration or inspection.

 

John P. Lapotaire, CIEC
•Certified Indoor Environmental Consultant
•Microshield Environmental Services, LLC
www.Microshield-ES.com


Mold Scams. Don’t be a Victim of Mold Fraud.

February 27, 2011

#1 Mold Scam: Mold Inspections Performed by Mold Remediation Contractors

The biggest mold scam is and always has been – mold remediation contractors who perform mold inspections. When it comes to mold, you do NOT want a mold inspector who is motivated to find mold removal jobs for himself.

Mold remediation or mold abatement is a very profitable business and engaging in both mold inspections and mold remediation is a serious conflict of interest. The potential for fraudulently creating thousands of dollars in bogus mold removal work that never needed to be done is tremendous and – unfortunately – an everyday occurrence in this industry.

This is fraudulent practice of securing your own work by inspecting for mold then offering to remediate the mold is against the Law in the State of Florida.  Your Mold Remediator and Mold Inspector MUST be Licensed by the State.  Under the Florida Licensing Law the Mold Remediator Cannot perform Mold Remediation on any job that he or she has performed the Mold Inspection.

This is the oldest mold scam going and it’s easy to pull off because most consumers don’t know enough about mold to realize when they’re being bamboozled into work that is often grossly exaggerated, and in some instances, may not even need to be done.

Just this past week an Orlando Mold Remediator (Florida State licensed as a remediator and un-licensed as a mold inspector) was arrested on charges that he falsified testing records and defrauded customers.  DEP alleges, mold remediator obtained samples that he told his clients would be tested, however, no testing occurred.  Authorities say mold remediator provided fictitious laboratory reports to clients that were extremely technical.   He then offered assistance in performing “remediation,” for the mold problems

Remember, Convenience Can Cost You.
Most people prefer to deal with one contractor for everything because it’s convenient.  But when it comes to mold, that convenience can end up costing you thousands of dollars in unnecessary repair work.  There are enough reputable and Florida State Licensed Mold Inspectors who do not engage in remediation work to risk getting ripped off.

Remember a mold inspection should be completely unbiased.   Mold inspectors should have no personal interest in how an inspection turns out, nor should they ever profit from what they find, either directly by doing the removal themselves, or indirectly by referring work to their friends for a kick-back.

Avoid the Scam.
The only way to ensure you will get an unbiased inspection report and avoid this mold scam is to hire a Florida State Licensed Mold Inspector who does not perform mold remediation.

#2 Mold Scam: Free Post-Remediation Clearance Testing

The final step in the mold removal process is a Post-Remediation Verification Inspection (PRVI) or Mold Clearance Test to verify and document that the remediation was successful. If you are paying for the remediation work out-of-pocket, you will want confirmation that the mold problem is gone before making the final payment to your contractor. If the remediation is being paid for by your insurance company or required by a mortgage lender, they will typically require a third-party clearance test before payment or funding.

REMEMBER:

Post-remediation verification inspection and testing should never be performed by a mold remediator waiting to get paid for his work.  This is no different than a student grading his own final exam.   Many mold remediation contractors even offer “FREE” mold clearance testing.  Some will include it in the price of the job. But it is never in your best interest to let a contractor grade his final exam. With hundreds, if not thousands of dollars on the line and no way to charge you more if it fails, it is highly unlikely that a mold contractor will fail his own work.

Post-remediation verification inspection and testing  should always be done after all the mold has been removed but before any re-construction work begins so the inspector can visually see that there is no mold left on the remediated materials.

Avoid the Scam
The way to avoid this scam is the same as Mold Scam #1. Have your post-remediation verification inspection and testing performed by a Florida State Licensed Mold Inspector who does not work for your mold remediation contractor.

Get a Mold Remediation Protocol Specific to your Loss.
A Remediation Protocol outlines the needed actions for any necessary mold remediation. Each plan is individually prepared based on the Indoor Environmental Consultants Mold Assessment of the property the size and area of the mold contamination.

A properly prepared Mold Remediation Protocol should be written according to the ANSI Aproved IICRC S-520 standard and reference guide for the remediation of mold damaged structures and contents.

The Remediation Protocol will specify the remediation containment strategy, decontamination areas, negative air pressure and air filtration(scrubbing), equipment utilization, personnel protective equipment, specific cleaning protocols, project completion requirements, site-specific safety plan and clearance testing that will confirm the post remediation goals have been met.

Once the Mold Remediation Protocol, specifying the proper procedures, guidelines, and activities related to the removal of microbial compromised building materials and subsequent cleanup activities has been established the Mold Remediation Protocol can then be utilized to obtain written bids on the cost to carry out the protocol specifications from several qualified mold remediation contractors.

#3 Mold Scam: “FREE” Mold Inspection & Mold Testing
When it comes to mold, the general public knows little to nothing other than what they read on the internet or hear from someone who makes money selling mold-related products or services.  Most people who call a mold inspector or mold removal contractor are not really sure if they have a mold problem or not.  Maybe they smell something maybe they had a toilet back up in the past, or had a flood. Perhaps they’re experiencing some unexplained health condition that they believe might be caused by mold growing in their home. Its one thing to know for certain that you have a mold problem, but quite another to not know for sure.  And between the ‘not knowing’ and all the hype and scare tactics that are used to sell mold services by both mold inspections and mold remediation, it’s only natural for people to be somewhat ‘fearful’ when they call a mold removal company.

Fear is a powerful motivator and many unscrupulous mold contractors are masters at playing the fear card to create a sense of urgency in order to motivate you to sign a contract right away. That is not to say that all mold remediation contractors are unscrupulous. There are many excellent contractors out there. But in these slow economic times, it is wise to beware of anyone using words like; “FREE MOLD INSPECTION”, “FREE CONSULTATION”, “FREE TESTING”, and “FREE SAMPLES” in their pitch. More often than not, free comes with a hefty price that ends up costing far more than you thought it would and never has that been more true than in the mold business.

Avoid the Scam
The safest thing consumers can do whenever the word “FREE” is used to sell a mold remediation job is to avoid that contractor all together. Think about it. No one is in business to do anything for free. Anyone offering something for free is doing so to sell you something else. While that may be fine when it comes to “buy one – get one free” deals offered on TV infomercials, in the mold business a free inspections and testing can end up costing you thousands of dollars for remediation work that may be grossly exaggerated or in some cases doesn’t need to be done at all.

#4 Mold Scam: “FREE” Post-Remediation Clearance Testing
The final step in the mold removal process is a post-remediation survey done to verify and document that the remediation was in fact successful. The survey should be done before any re-construction work begins so the inspector can visually see that there is no mold left on the remediated materials.

Many mold remediation contractors offer “FREE” post-remediation verification inspection and testing. Mold Clearance testing is vital to the mold remediation process. Insurance companies, mortgage lenders and prospective buyers of your property in the future will want to see written confirmation that the mold issue was resolved. Post-remediation clearance testing should never be performed by a mold removal contractor waiting to get paid for his work. With thousands of dollars on the line, it is highly unlikely that a contractor will fail his own work.

Avoid the Scam
Have your post-remediation survey and clearance test performed by a Florida State Licensed Mold Inspector who does not work for your remediation contractor.

#5 Mold Scam: Killing Mold
Killing mold sounds like a good idea, but is it really? To understand this premise you must first understand the different characteristics between molds that are viable (alive) and molds that are dead (non-viable). Once you do it will be clear why killing mold is not a good option for dealing with a mold problem.

I have had to explain this issue many times and have come up with my Cow analogy that seems to work well.  It goes something like this.

I tell the remediator to think of himself as being in the Cow removal business and a client has asked him to come over and get a cow out of their living room.

If “You” the cow removal company, races over pulls out a chemical or fogging gun and kills the cow right there in the client’s living room. Have you completed the job? Sadly the answer if far too often Yes.
That’s when I tell them that this is where I come in on behalf of the client to verify that the cow is gone.
Have to point out to the cow removal company that even though the cow is dead the cow is clearly still right there in the client’s living room.

I explain to the cow removal company that they were hired to remove the client’s cow and as far as I can tell the client still has a cow.

Soooooo get back in there and get the cow.

Who Promotes the Idea of Killing Mold and Why? Follow the Money

Mold remediators looking to maximize their profits will often sell Heat, Ozone, Hydroxyls, or Anti-Microbial Fogging as a form of mold remediation.  This only works out well for your mold remediator.  It leaves you with a new indoor contaminant. There is however a mold remediation standard of practice.  Its an American National Standards Institute ANSI approved standard.

ANSI Approved S-520 Standard and Reference Guide for Professional Mold Remediation.  The S-520 is procedural standard and reference guide for the remediation of mold damaged structures and contents.  The S-520 is based on reliable remediation and restoration principles, research and practical experience.

The S520 provides a philosophical shift away from setting numerical mold contamination action levels. Instead, it establishes mold contamination definitions, descriptions and conditions (1, 2, 3), and general guidance, which, when properly applied, can assist remediators and others in determining criteria that trigger remediation activities or confirm remediation success.

Contaminated as the presence of indoor mold growth and/or spores, whose identity, location and amplification are not reflective of a normal fungal ecology for an indoor environment, and which may produce adverse health effects and cause damage to materials, and adversely affect the operation or function of building systems.

Condition 1 (normal ecology) – may have settled spores, fungal fragments or traces of actual growth whose identity, location and quantity is reflective of a normal fungal ecology for an indoor environment.

Condition 2 (settled spores) – an indoor environment which is primarily contaminated with settled spores that were dispersed directly or indirectly from a Condition 3 area, and which may have traces of actual growth.

Condition 3 (actual growth) – an indoor environment contaminated with the presence of actual growth and associated spores. Actual growth includes growth that is active or dormant, visible or hidden.

The killing of mold once you remove the actual visible growing mold still leaves the Condition 2 (settled spores) – an indoor environment which is primarily contaminated with settled spores that were dispersed directly or indirectly from a Condition 3 area, and which may have traces of actual growth.

 

 

  • John P. Lapotaire, CIEC
  • Certified Indoor Environmental Consultant
  • Microshield Environmental Services, LLC
  • www.Microshield-ES.com